NEW YORK (AP) â€" Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany says he would support a rejecting of involuntary bids to a Bowl Championship Series as prolonged as a teams from his joining get to play in a Rose Bowl.
But if college football's leaders wish to spin a BCS into a four-team playoff, Delany skeleton to pull back. And Notre Dame jaunty executive Jack Swarbrick would be on Delany's side of a debate.
Delany was during a Intercollegiate Athletics Forum on Thursday, partial of a row contention with Atlantic Coast Conference Commissioner John Swofford, Conference USA Commissioner Britton Banowsky and Mountain West Conference Commissioner Craig Thompson.
The commissioners, university presidents and jaunty directors who control a BCS are in a early stages of final a destiny of vital college football's argumentative postseason system.
Among a many probable changes is expelling involuntary bids to a highest-paying play games and carrying a BCS set usually a matchup for a No. 1 vs. No. 2 national championship game. The other play games would be giveaway to make deals with whatever schools and leagues they would like, most a approach it was before a BCS.
Banowsky pronounced automatic-bid standing had turn pisive. C-USA, that does not have an automatic bid, only mislaid 3 members â€" SMU, Houston and UCF â€" to a Big East, one of 6 conferences that has an involuntary bid by a 2013 season. Thompson's league, that also is a non-AQ conference, is losing Boise State and San Diego State to a Big East.
"I feel strongly that it has been a disastrous motorist from a perspective," Banowsky said. "I wish that as we develop a BCS we do it in a approach that can emanate a some-more happy BCS though formulating these category systems. we consider it's probable to do it, emanate a rival format that requires teams to be rival teams in sequence to attend and rewards a teams that are competitive."
Delany followed with a response that drew laughs from those in a swarming hotel contention room.
"As prolonged as we can go to a Rose Bowl, I'm OK though involuntary bids," Delany said. "If Brit doesn't wish involuntary bids, that's excellent with me. And if he doesn't wish me to have one, that's OK, as prolonged as we can go to Pasadena."
Delany told reporters later: "If they (Banowsky and Thompson) are saying, essentially, let a complement be marketplace based, we can't intent to that."
The Big Ten and a Pac-12 have a prolonged and remunerative attribute with a Rose Bowl. In a stream BCS set up, a champions of those leagues play in a Rose Bowl unless they are in a inhabitant championship game. The BCS has authorised teams from other conferences some-more opportunities to play in a prestigious California game, including TCU of a Mountain West final season.
"That event wouldn't have come about if a BCS complement hadn't existed," Thompson said. "However, is it a improved universe for that event to exist for a Big Ten and a (Pac-12) though these involuntary subordinate standards? That contention has started and I'm vehement about a event to continue to have that and see where it comes out."
Thompson has due both an eight- and 16-team playoff complement to a other 10 vital contention commissioners.
"It hasn't left genuine well," he pronounced with a smile.
Swofford, along with Southeastern Conference Commissioner Mike Slive, due in 2008 a four-team playoff format famous as a plus-one. It was shot down by not only a Big Ten and a then-Pac-10, though a Big 12 and a Big East as well.
There seems to be flourishing support for a plus-one entering into this turn of BCS negotiations.
On Wednesday during a forum, that is sponsored by IMG and hosted by SportsBusiness Journal/Daily, Stanford jaunty executive Bob Bowlsby pronounced a plus-one indication was "inevitable" and Washington's Scott Woodward pronounced he upheld it and believed it would "eventually" happen.
Swofford pronounced he suspicion college football's leaders were some-more open to changes in a BCS than ever before, and he still supports a plus-one.
"Two some-more teams would have a event to play for a inhabitant championship," he said. "It wouldn't discharge a controversy. It's a mini-playoff that concerns people, since that can be a sleazy slope if we demeanour during a story of a NCAA and a playoffs. They start with one series and they really fast grow to incomparable numbers, and that bothers people.
"I consider there could be some-more support for it if there were a approach to assure some people that it would be contained as a plus-one."
Count Delany and Swarbrick among those who fear that sleazy slope.
"That's what happened in I-AA (football). It's what happened in a (NCAA) basketball tournament. It's what would fundamentally occur here," Delany said. "I don't indispensably consider a sleazy slope is theoretical. we consider a sleazy slope is practical."
Notre Dame, a football independent, also has a opinion in a BCS negotiations.
Swarbrick pronounced he's "not a fan of a plus-one."
"I consider there is movement for change," he said. "I'm substantially a small reduction certain than Bob (Bowlsby) of a form of a change."
News referensi http://news.yahoo.com/delany-ok-no-aq-long-big-ten-rose-173518977.html
No comments:
Post a Comment